Plank Calories Burned Calculator
Calculate calories burned during planks based on your weight, plank variation, hold duration, and number of sets

How Many Calories Burned During Planks?
A standard forearm plank burns approximately 2-4 calories per minute for an average person weighing 70 kg (154 lbs). This translates to 6-12 calories for a 3-minute plank session (3 sets × 1-minute holds). While this may seem modest compared to cardio exercises, planks deliver exceptional value through core strengthening, posture improvement, and injury prevention benefits that extend far beyond calorie burn.
According to the Compendium of Physical Activities, static planks fall under light to moderate calisthenics (Code 02024) with MET values ranging from 3.0 to 4.0. Dynamic plank variations like mountain climbers can reach MET 8.0, significantly increasing calorie burn. Use our MET calculator to understand how intensity affects energy expenditure.
The Science of Isometric Core Training
Unlike dynamic exercises that involve muscle shortening and lengthening, planks use isometric contraction—your muscles generate force while maintaining a fixed position. This unique training stimulus develops muscular endurance, joint stability, and neuromuscular control in ways that crunches and sit-ups cannot replicate.
Calories per Minute = (MET × 3.5 × Body Weight in kg) ÷ 200
Total Calories = Calories per Minute × Total Hold Time (minutes)
Calories/Min: (3.8 × 3.5 × 70) ÷ 200 = 4.66 cal/min
Total Calories: 4.66 × 1.5 = 7 calories
Research on core stability training demonstrates that planks improve trunk muscle endurance by 20-30% over 8 weeks of consistent practice. This enhanced core stability translates to better performance in exercises like deadlifts, squats, and running—where a stable core prevents energy leakage and reduces injury risk.
Plank Variations: From Core Stability to Calorie Burn
| Plank Variation | MET Value | Cal/1 Min* | Cal/3 Min* | Primary Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Forearm Plank | 3.0 | 3.7 cal | 11 cal | Core endurance foundation |
| High Plank (Push-up Position) | 3.5 | 4.3 cal | 13 cal | Shoulder stability |
| Standard Forearm Plank | 3.8 | 4.7 cal | 14 cal | Balanced core activation |
| Side Plank | 4.0 | 4.9 cal | 15 cal | Oblique targeting |
| Plank Shoulder Taps | 5.0 | 6.1 cal | 18 cal | Anti-rotation strength |
| Weighted Plank | 5.5 | 6.7 cal | 20 cal | Progressive overload |
| Plank Jacks | 6.0 | 7.4 cal | 22 cal | Cardio + core combo |
| Plank to Push-up | 6.5 | 8.0 cal | 24 cal | Upper body integration |
| Mountain Climbers | 8.0 | 9.8 cal | 29 cal | High-intensity cardio |
*Based on a 70 kg (154 lb) person. Heavier individuals burn more; lighter individuals burn fewer calories.
Progression strategy: Master the basic forearm plank for 60 seconds before advancing to dynamic variations. Research comparing plank variations shows that modified planks (like side planks) provide superior oblique activation compared to standard planks. For maximum calorie burn, combine planks with exercises like burpees and mountain climbers in a circuit training format.
Planks as Injury Prevention: The Hidden Value
While calorie burn is modest, planks deliver exceptional return on investment for injury prevention. A strong core acts as a natural weight belt, protecting your spine during heavy lifts, athletic movements, and daily activities. Studies show that core strengthening programs reduce lower back pain incidence by up to 35% in active populations.
| Body Weight | 1 Min Hold | 3 Min Total | 5 Min Total | 10 Min Session |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 kg (110 lb) | 3 cal | 10 cal | 17 cal | 33 cal |
| 60 kg (132 lb) | 4 cal | 12 cal | 20 cal | 40 cal |
| 70 kg (154 lb) | 5 cal | 14 cal | 23 cal | 47 cal |
| 80 kg (176 lb) | 5 cal | 16 cal | 27 cal | 53 cal |
| 90 kg (198 lb) | 6 cal | 18 cal | 30 cal | 60 cal |
| 100 kg (220 lb) | 7 cal | 20 cal | 33 cal | 67 cal |
*Calculations based on standard forearm plank (3.8 METs). Dynamic variations burn 50-100% more calories.
Planks vs. Crunches vs. Sit-Ups: Which Is Best?
| Factor | Planks | Crunches | Sit-Ups |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calorie Burn (per 10 min) | 47 cal (MET 3.8) | 34 cal (MET 2.8) | 59 cal (MET 4.8) |
| Core Stability | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent | ⭐⭐ Limited | ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate |
| Spinal Safety | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very Safe | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Safe (short ROM) | ⭐⭐ Risk with poor form |
| Deep Core Activation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ High (TVA) | ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate | ⭐⭐ Low |
| Functional Transfer | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent | ⭐⭐ Limited | ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate |
| Equipment Needed | None | None (mat optional) | None (mat optional) |
| Beginner Friendly | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Yes (scalable) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very easy | ⭐⭐⭐ Moderate |
The verdict: Planks win for functional core strength and injury prevention. While sit-ups burn more calories and crunches isolate the rectus abdominis, planks develop the transverse abdominis (TVA)—the deep core muscle that acts like a natural corset. For visible abs, combine planks with a caloric deficit and compound movements. Track your body fat percentage to monitor progress.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Core & Fitness Calculators
References
- Snarr, Ronald L.1; Esco, Michael R.2. Electromyographical Comparison of Plank Variations Performed With and Without Instability Devices. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 28(11):p 3298-3305, November 2014. | DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000521
- Park, S., Choi, H., & Jee, S. (2023). Effects of plank exercise on respiratory capacity, physical fitness, and immunocytes in older adults. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 19(6), 332. https://doi.org/10.12965/jer.2346536.268
- Park, K., Lee, S., Heo, J., & Jee, S. (2021). Effects of High Intensity Plank Exercise on Physical Fitness and Immunocyte Function in a Middle-Aged Man: A Case Report. Medicina, 57(8), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080845
- Selvakumar, Kiruthika & Manoharlal, Manoj & Rusli, Nadia & Jing, Low & Thirruvevenkadam, Ilayaraja. (2021). Effectiveness of Modified Plank vs Conventional Plank on Core Muscle Endurance and Stability in Recreational Athletes: A Quasi-Experimental study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 15. 04-10. 10.7860/JCDR/2021/48224.15043.
- Conger SA, Herrmann SD, Willis EA, Nightingale TE, Sherman JR, Ainsworth BE. 2024 Wheelchair Compendium of Physical Activities: An update of activity codes and energy expenditure values. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2024;13(1): 18-23.
- Herrmann SD, Willis EA, Ainsworth BE, Barreira TV, Hastert M, Kracht CL, Schuna Jr. JM, Cai Z, Quan M, Tudor-Locke C, Whitt-Glover MC, Jacobs DR. 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activities. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2024;13(1): 6-12.

Manish is a NASM-certified fitness and nutrition coach with over 10 years of experience in weight lifting and fat loss fitness coaching. He specializes in gym-based training and has a lot of knowledge about exercise, lifting technique, biomechanics, and more.
Through “Fit Life Regime,” he generously shares the insights he’s gained over a decade in the field. His goal is to equip others with the knowledge to start their own fitness journey.